Loading…
Utility of Indigenously Developed Square Grid Method for Evaluation of Tumor-Stroma Ratio and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Pilot Study
Background & ObjectiveInvasive breast carcinoma (IBC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in India. The conventional visual method of evaluation of Tumor-Stroma Ratio (TSR) and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTIL) appears to be subjective. The present study aims to evaluat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Iranian journal of pathology 2023-07, Vol.18 (3), p.335-346 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background & ObjectiveInvasive breast carcinoma (IBC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in India. The conventional visual method of evaluation of Tumor-Stroma Ratio (TSR) and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTIL) appears to be subjective. The present study aims to evaluate the utility of the indigenously designed square grid method for the evaluation of tumor-stroma ratio and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in invasive breast carcinoma by assessing the inter-observer variability.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a rural tertiary care referral institute from July 2018 to June 2020. In each case, microphotographs were taken from 10 representative fields in H&E-stained sections for evaluating TSR in low-power and sTIL in high-power. Both the parameters were evaluated employing an indigenously designed square grid applied onto microphotographs in the power-point slides by making use of principles of the Pythagorean theorem. Both parameters were separately evaluated by two pathologists. Cohen kappa statistics was the statistical tool used to analyze inter-observer variability.ResultsThirty cases were analyzed. Invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST) was the most common histopathological type (26 cases (86.67%)). For TRS evaluation, a Kappa value of 0.78 suggested substantial agreement with an agreement of 91.67%. For sTIL evaluation, a Kappa value of 0.51 suggested moderate agreement with an agreement of 88.33%. The P-values were statistically highly significant (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1735-5303 2345-3656 |
DOI: | 10.30699/IJP.2023.1989528.3063 |