Electronic Health Record Use and Perceptions among Urologic Surgeons

Abstract Objective  Electronic health records (EHRs) have become widely adopted with increasing emphasis on improving care delivery. Improvements in surgery may be limited by specialty-specific issues that impact EHR usability and engagement. Accordingly, we examined EHR use and perceptions in urolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied clinical informatics 2023-03, Vol.14 (2), p.279-289
Main Authors: Tan, Hung-Jui, Chung, Arlene E., Gotz, David, Deal, Allison M., Heiling, Hillary M., Teal, Randall, Vu, Maihan B., Meeks, William D., Fang, Raymond, Bennett, Antonia V., Nielsen, Matthew E., Basch, Ethan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Delivery of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Humans
Patient Care
Research Article
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urologic Surgical Procedures
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective  Electronic health records (EHRs) have become widely adopted with increasing emphasis on improving care delivery. Improvements in surgery may be limited by specialty-specific issues that impact EHR usability and engagement. Accordingly, we examined EHR use and perceptions in urology, a diverse surgical specialty. Methods  We conducted a national, sequential explanatory mixed methods study. Through the 2019 American Urological Association Census, we surveyed urologic surgeons on EHR use and perceptions and then identified associated characteristics through bivariable and multivariable analyses. Using purposeful sampling, we interviewed 25 urologists and applied coding-based thematic analysis, which was then integrated with survey findings. Results  Among 2,159 practicing urologic surgeons, 2,081 (96.4%) reported using an EHR. In the weighted sample ( n  = 12,366), over 90% used the EHR for charting, viewing results, and order entry with most using information exchange functions (59.0–79.6%). In contrast, only 35.8% felt the EHR increases clinical efficiency, whereas 43.1% agreed it improves patient care, which related thematically to information management, administrative burden, patient safety, and patient–surgeon interaction. Quantitatively and qualitatively, use and perceptions differed by years in practice and practice type with more use and better perceptions among more recent entrants into the urologic workforce and those in academic/multispecialty practices, who may have earlier EHR exposure, better infrastructure, and more support. Conclusion  Despite wide and substantive usage, EHRs engender mixed feelings, especially among longer-practicing surgeons and those in lower-resourced settings (e.g., smaller and private practices). Beyond reducing administrative burden and simplifying information management, efforts to improve care delivery through the EHR should focus on surgeon engagement, particularly in the community, to boost implementation and user experience.
ISSN:1869-0327
1869-0327
DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1763513