Coding for Physical Restraint Status Among Hospitalized Patients: a 2019 National Inpatient Sample Analysis

Background The reduction of physical restraint utilization in the hospital setting is a key goal of high-quality care, but little is known about the rate of restraint use in general hospitals in the USA. Objective This study reports the rate of physical restraint coding among acute care hospital dis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2023-08, Vol.38 (11), p.2461-2469
Main Authors: Luccarelli, James, Sacks, Chana A., Snydeman, Colleen, Luccarelli, Christopher, Smith, Felicia, Beach, Scott R., McCoy Jr, Thomas H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coding
Cohort analysis
Constraints
Demographics
Demography
Design factors
Diabetes mellitus
Diagnosis
Encephalitis
Hospitals
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Research
Patients
Physical restraints
Sex
Utilization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The reduction of physical restraint utilization in the hospital setting is a key goal of high-quality care, but little is known about the rate of restraint use in general hospitals in the USA. Objective This study reports the rate of physical restraint coding among acute care hospital discharges in the USA and explores associated demographic and diagnostic factors. Design The National Inpatient Sample, a de-identified all-payors database of acute care hospital discharges in the USA, was queried for patients aged 18 and older with a diagnosis code for physical restraint status in 2019. Participants Hospitalized patients aged 18 and older. Main Measures Demographics, discharge diagnoses, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital charges. Key Results In total, 220,470 (95% CI: 208,114 to 232,826) hospitalizations, or 0.7% of overall hospitalizations, included a discharge code for physical restraint status. There was a 700-fold difference in coding for restraint utilization based on diagnosis, with 7.4% of patients with encephalitis receiving restraint diagnosis codes compared to 
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-023-08179-3