Comparing preference related to comfort in torque-matched muscle contractions between two different types of functional electrical stimulation pulses in able-bodied participants

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is commonly used in rehabilitation to generate electrically-induced muscle contractions. FES has been shown to assist in the recovery of voluntary motor functions after stroke or spinal cord injury. However, discomfort associated with FES can motivate patients...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of spinal cord medicine 2021-09, Vol.44 (S1), p.S215-S224
Main Authors: Garcia-Garcia, Martha G., Jovanovic, Lazar I., Popovic, Milos R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Compex Motion
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electric Stimulation
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Functional electrical stimulation
Humans
Inverse exponential current pulse
Muscle Contraction
Muscle, Skeletal
MyndMove
Rectangular current pulse
Spinal Cord Injuries - therapy
Torque
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is commonly used in rehabilitation to generate electrically-induced muscle contractions. FES has been shown to assist in the recovery of voluntary motor functions after stroke or spinal cord injury. However, discomfort associated with FES can motivate patients to withdraw their participation from FES therapy despite its benefits. To address this issue, a functional electrical stimulator, called MyndMove™ (MyndTec Inc., Canada), has been developed to generate more comfortable contractions than conventional stimulators. Cross-sectional, interventional, with two treatment arms. A laboratory within a rehabilitation center. Twelve able-bodied participants. FES delivered with two different stimulators, MyndMove™ and Compex Motion (Compex, Switzerland), during muscle contractions of high, moderate and low stimulation intensity. Comfort-related preference to a given stimulator and the discomfort score rated through a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-101) for both stimulators. Participants perceived a reduction in discomfort during high-intensity stimulation generated using MyndMove™. In addition, MyndMove™ stimulations were preferred in 60% of all contractions. The reduction in discomfort associated with MyndMove™ might be due the fact that MyndMove™ delivers less charge to generate contractions of equivalent intensity, compared to Compex Motion. Reducing discomfort during FES may help in generating stronger and more clinically useful contractions, increasing accessibility of FES therapy to include individuals with low tolerance to FES.
ISSN:1079-0268
2045-7723
DOI:10.1080/10790268.2021.1970882