Assessing Public Opinion After 9/11 and Before the Iraq War

This study evaluates the frequency with which polls about Iraq and terrorism were fielded and reported in the media between September 11, 2001 and October 11, 2002. A content analysis of 4,481 poll questions and 4,964 references to poll-based public opinion in the media was conducted. There are stro...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	International journal of public opinion research 2011-07, Vol.23 (2), p.148-168
Main Authors:	Jomini Stroud, Natalie, Sparrow, Bartholomew H
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Elite Elites Iraq Iraq War-2003 Mass Media Media Media coverage News Coverage Opinion Polls Political Elites Politics Presidents Public Opinion Public opinion polls Public opinion surveys Rhetoric September 11th 2001 Terrorism U.S.A United States War
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	This study evaluates the frequency with which polls about Iraq and terrorism were fielded and reported in the media between September 11, 2001 and October 11, 2002. A content analysis of 4,481 poll questions and 4,964 references to poll-based public opinion in the media was conducted. There are strong relationships between media coverage of public opinion and the assessment of public opinion via polls. This study also examines whether the frequency with which the public was asked about Iraq and terrorism was related to the public's concern about these issues and to political elites' emphasis of these issues. Results suggest that public opinion polls do not consistently correspond with either the public salience of issues or the rhetoric of political elites. Instead, this paper argues, public opinion assessment is guided by prominent presidential speeches as well as by the priorities of the media. An analysis of how questions about Iraq and terrorism were phrased provides additional support for the influence of elites. Implications for the ability of polls to capture public opinion are discussed. Adapted from the source document.
ISSN:	0954-2892 1471-6909