Voice Analysis of Postlingually Deaf Adults Pre- and Postcochlear Implantation
Summary Objectives To ascertain whether cochlear implantation (CI), without specific vocal rehabilitation, is associated with changes in perceptual and acoustic vocal parameters in adults with severe to profound postlingual deafness. Hypothesis Merely restoring auditory feedback could allow the indi...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Journal of voice 2011-11, Vol.25 (6), p.692-699 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Summary Objectives To ascertain whether cochlear implantation (CI), without specific vocal rehabilitation, is associated with changes in perceptual and acoustic vocal parameters in adults with severe to profound postlingual deafness. Hypothesis Merely restoring auditory feedback could allow the individual to make necessary adjustments in vocal pattern. Study Design Prospective and longitudinal. Methods The experimental group composed of 40 postlingually deaf adults (20 males and 20 females) with no previous laryngeal or voice disorders. Participants’ voices were recorded before CI and 6–9 months after CI. To check for chance modifications between two evaluations, a control group of 12 postlingually deaf adults, six male and six female, without CI was also evaluated. All sessions composed of the recording of read sentences from Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice and sustained vowel /a/. Auditory and acoustic analyses were then conducted. Results We found a statistically significant reduction in overall severity, strain, loudness, and instability in auditory analysis. In vocal acoustic analysis, we found statistically significant reduction fundamental frequency ( F 0) values (in male participants) and F 0 variability (in both genders). The control group showed no statistically significant changes in most vocal parameters assessed, apart from pitch and F 0 (in female participants only). On comparing the interval of variation of results between the experimental and control groups, we found no statistically significant difference in vocal parameters between CI recipients and nonrecipients, with the exception of F 0 variability in male participants. Conclusions The patients in our sample showed changes in overall severity, strain, loudness, and instability values, and reductions in F 0 and its variability. On comparing the variation of results between the groups, we were able to prove in our study that implant recipients postlingually deaf adults (experimental group), without specific vocal rehabilitation, differed from nonrecipients (control group) in loudness and F 0 variability sustained vowel /a/ in male participants. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0892-1997 1873-4588 |