Loading…

Narrow-band imaging as an alternative to chromoendoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in long-standing inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective, randomized, crossover study

Background Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel technique that may represent an alternative method to chromoendoscopy (CE) for the detection of colitis-associated intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objective To compare NBI with CE for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2011-10, Vol.74 (4), p.840-848
Main Authors: Pellisé, Maria, MD, PhD, López-Cerón, Maria, MD, Rodríguez de Miguel, Cristina, RN, Jimeno, Mireya, MD, Zabalza, Michel, MD, Ricart, Elena, MD, PhD, Aceituno, Montserrat, MD, Fernández-Esparrach, Glòria, MD, PhD, Ginès, Angels, MD, PhD, Sendino, Oriol, MD, Cuatrecasas, Miriam, MD, PhD, Llach, Josep, MD, PhD, Panés, Julián, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a novel technique that may represent an alternative method to chromoendoscopy (CE) for the detection of colitis-associated intraepithelial neoplasia (IN) in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objective To compare NBI with CE for the detection of IN. Design Prospective, randomized, crossover study. Setting Academic hospital. Patients Patients with clinically inactive colonic IBD (≥8 years). Intervention Patients underwent both CE and NBI in randomized order. Targeted biopsy specimens from abnormal areas were obtained. Pathological examination was regarded as the reference standard. Main Outcome Measurements Number of false-positive and true-positive lesions in patients undergoing CE and NBI were compared as well as the proportion of patients with missed IN lesions. Results Eighty patients were screened, of whom 20 were excluded. Mean ± standard deviation withdrawal time for CE was significantly longer than that for NBI (26.87 ± 9.89 minutes vs 15.74 ± 5.62 minutes, P < .01). Thirteen patients had at least 1 IN lesion on 1 of the examinations. In the per-lesion analysis, NBI resulted in a significantly inferior false-positive biopsy rate ( P = .001) and a similar true-positive rate. The percentage of missed IN lesions and patients was superior with NBI, albeit without reaching statistical significance. Limitations Lesions were sampled immediately after detection, which precluded the possibility of paired analysis. Conclusions NBI appears to be a less time-consuming and equally effective alternative to CE for the detection of IN. However, given the NBI lesion and patient miss rates, it cannot be recommended as the standard technique.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2011.05.013