Protest events in international press coverage: An empirical critique of cross-national conflict databases

The empirical analysis of protest events and other expressions of social conflict is one of the core tasks of the discipline of comparative sociology. The numerous international data sets and empirical country comparisons that rely exclusively on reporting in English-language newspapers such as The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of comparative sociology 2011-06, Vol.52 (3), p.163-180
Main Authors: Herkenrath, Mark, Knoll, Alex
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Banking
Bias
Conflict
Cross-national analysis
Crosscultural Analysis
Empirical research
International Conflict
Latin America
Measurement
Media
Methodology (Data Collection)
Mexico
Paraguay
Political sociology
Press
Protest movements
Social Conflict
Social Indicators
Social movements
Social movements. Revolutions
Social representations
Sociology
Sociology of communication and mass media. Sociolinguistics
Sociology of knowledge and sociology of culture
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The empirical analysis of protest events and other expressions of social conflict is one of the core tasks of the discipline of comparative sociology. The numerous international data sets and empirical country comparisons that rely exclusively on reporting in English-language newspapers such as The New York Times in surveying protest events nevertheless suffer from considerable distortions. Using the example of some 1800 protest events in Argentina, Mexico and Paraguay in the year 2006, the present study shows that there are remarkable differences between national and international (English-language) newspapers when it comes to frequency of reporting. On the one hand, a mere 5.3 percent of all protest events that are reported nationally also attract the attention of the international press. On the other hand, the percentage of international reporting depends considerably and to a statistically significant extent on the country in which the protest takes place. Besides, these country differences persist when additional protest characteristics (e.g. the number of participants, the participation of renowned personalities and the escalation of the protest into rioting) are controlled by means of multivariate logistic regressions. The measurement error that results when surveying protest events on the strength of coverage in the English-language international press is therefore not constant across countries. The frequently used data sets like the World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators or the Cross-National Time Series Data Archive launched by Arthur Banks are thus proving to be highly questionable sources for international comparisons in protest and conflict research.
ISSN:0020-7152
1745-2554
DOI:10.1177/0020715211405417