Loading…

The influence of soluble carbon and fertilizer nitrogen on nitric oxide and nitrous oxide emissions from two contrasting agricultural soils

Contradictory effects of simultaneous available organic C and N sources on nitrous oxide (N 2O), carbon dioxide (CO 2) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes are reported in the literature. In order to clarify this controversy, laboratory experiments were conduced on two different soils, a semiarid arable soi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil biology & biochemistry 2008, Vol.40 (1), p.142-151
Main Authors: Sánchez-Martín, Laura, Vallejo, Antonio, Dick, Jan, M Skiba, Ute
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Contradictory effects of simultaneous available organic C and N sources on nitrous oxide (N 2O), carbon dioxide (CO 2) and nitric oxide (NO) fluxes are reported in the literature. In order to clarify this controversy, laboratory experiments were conduced on two different soils, a semiarid arable soil from Spain (soil I, pH=7.5, 0.8%C) and a grassland soil from Scotland (soil II, pH=5.5, 4.1%C). Soils were incubated at two different moisture contents, at a water filled pore space (WFPS) of 90% and 40%. Ammonium sulphate, added at rates equivalent to 200 and 50 kg N ha −1, stimulated N 2O and NO emissions in both soils. Under wet conditions (90% WFPS), at high and low rates of N additions, cumulative N 2O emissions increased by 250.7 and 8.1 ng N 2O–N g −1 in comparison to the control, respectively, in soil I and by 472.2 and 2.1 ng N 2O–N g −1, respectively, in soil II. NO emissions only significantly increased in soil I at the high N application rate with and without glucose addition and at both 40% and 90% WFPS. In both soils additions of glucose together with the high N application rate (200 kg N ha −1) reduced cumulative N 2O and NO emissions by 94% and 55% in soil I, and by 46% and 66% in soil II, respectively. These differences can be explained by differences in soil properties, including pH, soil mineral N and total and dissolved organic carbon content. It is speculated that nitrifier denitrification was the main source of NO and N 2O in the C-poor Spanish soil, and coupled nitrification–denitrification in the C-rich Scottish soil.
ISSN:0038-0717
1879-3428
DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.016