Loading…
ROSES: role of self-monitoring of blood glucose and intensive education in patients with Type 2 diabetes not receiving insulin. A pilot randomized clinical trial
Diabet. Med. 28, 789–796 (2011) Aims To estimate the efficacy of a self‐monitoring‐based disease management strategy in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agent monotherapy. Methods This was an open‐label, randomized, pilot study, primarily led by diabetes nurses. Patients were random...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetic medicine 2011-07, Vol.28 (7), p.789-796 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Diabet. Med. 28, 789–796 (2011)
Aims To estimate the efficacy of a self‐monitoring‐based disease management strategy in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral agent monotherapy.
Methods This was an open‐label, randomized, pilot study, primarily led by diabetes nurses. Patients were randomly allocated to either a self‐monitoring‐based disease management strategy or usual care (ratio 3:1) and followed up for 6 months. Education was centred on how to modify lifestyle according self‐monitoring readings. Self‐monitoring of blood glucose results were discussed during monthly telephone contact. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c levels, estimated with an ANOVA for repeated measures. All analyses were intention to treat.
Results Three diabetic clinics recruited 62 patients, of whom five were lost to follow‐up. At baseline, both groups had a mean HbA1c value of 7.9% ± 0.6% (63 ± 6 mmol/mol). After 6 months, mean HbA1c reduction was 1.2 ± 0.1% (–13 ± 1 mmol/mol) in the intervention group and 0.7 ± 0.2 (–8 ± 2 mmol/mol) in the control group, with an absolute mean difference between groups of –0.5% (95% CI −0.9 to −0.0%; P = 0.04) (−5 mmol/mol, 95% CI −10 to 0). At study end, 61.9% of patients in the intervention group and 20.0% in the control group reached the target level of HbA1c |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0742-3071 1464-5491 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03268.x |