Loading…

Resistance to cypermethrin, deltamethrin and chlorpyriphos in populations of Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) from small farms of the State of São Paulo, Brazil

A field survey of resistance was conducted based on the larval packet test technique with synthetic pyrethroids (cypermethrin and deltamethrin) and organophosphates (chlorpyriphos) in Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) microplus field populations from six different regions of the State of São Paulo (Brazil)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary parasitology 2011-06, Vol.178 (3), p.383-388
Main Authors: Mendes, M.C., Lima, C.K.P., Nogueira, A.H.C., Yoshihara, E., Chiebao, D.P., Gabriel, F.H.L., Ueno, T.E.H., Namindome, A., Klafke, G.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A field survey of resistance was conducted based on the larval packet test technique with synthetic pyrethroids (cypermethrin and deltamethrin) and organophosphates (chlorpyriphos) in Rhipicephalus ( Boophilus) microplus field populations from six different regions of the State of São Paulo (Brazil). 82.6% of the populations showed resistance to cypermethrin, 86.36% to deltamethrin and 65.25% to chlorpyriphos, with 50% presenting resistance to both SP and OP acaricide. According to the questionnaires completed by the producers, OP + SP mixtures followed by SP-only formulations were the products most commonly used for controlling the cattle tick in the surveyed areas. The present study showed high occurrence of resistance to SP and OP in the State of São Paulo, Brazil and revealed the type of strategy adopted by small dairy farms in this state. This information is fundamental in order to establish the monitoring of resistance on each farm individually, contributing to the rational use of acaricides for the control of R. ( B.) microplus.
ISSN:0304-4017
1873-2550
DOI:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.006