Near-field zooplankton, ice-face biota and proximal hydrography of free-drifting Antarctic icebergs

A small ROV was used to collect plankton, make video surveys and take hydrographic measurements in close proximity to six free-drifting, Antarctic icebergs. The icebergs studied ranged in size from 32 km in length. Large icebergs have a greater scale of influence than do smaller ones and iceberg-med...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Deep-sea research. Part II, Topical studies in oceanography Topical studies in oceanography, 2011-06, Vol.58 (11), p.1457-1468
Main Authors: Sherlock, R.E., Reisenbichler, K.R., Bush, S.L., Osborn, K.J., Robison, B.H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ablation
Antarctica
Chlorophylls
Deep sea
Ice
Iceberg
Icebergs
Marine
Plankton
Proximity
ROV
Southern Ocean
Surface water
Weddell Sea
Zooplankton
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A small ROV was used to collect plankton, make video surveys and take hydrographic measurements in close proximity to six free-drifting, Antarctic icebergs. The icebergs studied ranged in size from 32 km in length. Large icebergs have a greater scale of influence than do smaller ones and iceberg-mediated differences in the hydrographic characteristics of their surrounding water depend on the scale sampled. Irrespective of size, temperature generally decreased in close proximity to an iceberg while salinity increased. Chlorophyll a was often lower in the surface waters near the iceberg, relative to the surface waters further away. Tabular icebergs typically had 3 distinct underwater features: shelf, side and bottom. Ablation pockets were a common feature of subsurface ice. The ice itself is a dynamic and seemingly harsh environment with relatively few macrofauna living on it. Those that do inhabit the ice face are either highly specialized or highly mobile. Species composition of zooplankton within 40 m of an iceberg did not change relative to distance. However, biomass was generally greater within 5 m of an iceberg than it was 15 to 40 m distant.
ISSN:0967-0645
1879-0100
DOI:10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.11.025