Loading…

Practicable Group Testing Method to Evaluate Weight/Weight GMO Content in Maize Grains

Because of the increasing use of maize hybrids with genetically modified (GM) stacked events, the established and commonly used bulk sample methods for PCR quantification of GM maize in non-GM maize are prone to overestimate the GM organism (GMO) content, compared to the actual weight/weight percent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2011-07, Vol.59 (13), p.6856-6863
Main Authors: Mano, Junichi, Yanaka, Yuka, Ikezu, Yoko, Onishi, Mari, Futo, Satoshi, Minegishi, Yasutaka, Ninomiya, Kenji, Yotsuyanagi, Yuichi, Spiegelhalter, Frank, Akiyama, Hiroshi, Teshima, Reiko, Hino, Akihiro, Naito, Shigehiro, Koiwa, Tomohiro, Takabatake, Reona, Furui, Satoshi, Kitta, Kazumi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Because of the increasing use of maize hybrids with genetically modified (GM) stacked events, the established and commonly used bulk sample methods for PCR quantification of GM maize in non-GM maize are prone to overestimate the GM organism (GMO) content, compared to the actual weight/weight percentage of GM maize in the grain sample. As an alternative method, we designed and assessed a group testing strategy in which the GMO content is statistically evaluated based on qualitative analyses of multiple small pools, consisting of 20 maize kernels each. This approach enables the GMO content evaluation on a weight/weight basis, irrespective of the presence of stacked-event kernels. To enhance the method’s user-friendliness in routine application, we devised an easy-to-use PCR-based qualitative analytical method comprising a sample preparation step in which 20 maize kernels are ground in a lysis buffer and a subsequent PCR assay in which the lysate is directly used as a DNA template. This method was validated in a multilaboratory collaborative trial.
ISSN:0021-8561
1520-5118
DOI:10.1021/jf200212v