Negotiating grammatical choices: Academic language learning by secondary ESL students

This paper reports on a part of a year-long investigation into high school ESL students’ academic language development. Eight participants were pulled out of their intermediate ESL class for weekly 50-minute sessions with the author for a year. While the main focus of the sessions was reading news m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:System (Linköping) 2009-09, Vol.37 (3), p.391-402
Main Author: Shin, Sarah J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Discourse
Academic language development
English (Second Language)
English for Academic Purposes
English for academic purposes (EAP)
Focus-on-form
Grammar
High School Students
Language Acquisition
Secondary English language learners
Sentence-combining
Sentences
Teaching grammar
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper reports on a part of a year-long investigation into high school ESL students’ academic language development. Eight participants were pulled out of their intermediate ESL class for weekly 50-minute sessions with the author for a year. While the main focus of the sessions was reading news magazine articles for meaning, the author purposely drew students’ attention to potentially difficult grammatical forms. Four sessions were on sentence-combining strategies in which the participants practiced rewriting sentences and discussed their justifications for their grammatical and rhetorical choices. Multiple solutions were encouraged and the participants negotiated meaning derived from the various ways of rewriting the sentences. These sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and each participant’s written responses were analyzed for grammatical accuracy, clarity, and completeness in meaning, and compared with his/her oral justification. The stronger students in the group exhibited greater willingness to experiment with different ways of rewriting sentences and had an “ear” for what academic English sounded like. In contrast, the weaker students stumbled on individual words and had considerable difficulty when presented with multiple sentences. This paper discusses the critical role of the teacher in drawing students’ attention to form within a meaning-driven, interactive discussion of academic English.
ISSN:0346-251X
1879-3282
DOI:10.1016/j.system.2009.01.002