Loading…
Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: a methodological note on Rispoli (1999)
Rispoli (1999) suggests that previous studies arguing for a contingency between the case of subject pronouns and the presence/absence of verbal agreement in the acquisition of English (e.g. Schütze, 1997) suffer from methodological problems, and presents new data that fail to support earlier finding...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of child language 2001-06, Vol.28 (2), p.507-515 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Rispoli (1999) suggests that previous studies arguing for a contingency
between the case of subject pronouns and the presence/absence of verbal
agreement in the acquisition of English (e.g. Schütze, 1997) suffer from
methodological problems, and presents new data that fail to support
earlier findings. I show that Rispoli's methodology unnecessarily biases
his study against finding the predicted contingencies: it fails to take
account of children's productive lexical inventory of pronoun forms. As
a result, syntactic versus morphological sources of error fail to be
distinguished. I explain why this distinction is crucial within the
AGR/Tense Omission Model, and clarify its predictions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-0009 1469-7602 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0305000901004731 |