Loading…
Involvement of the AT₁ receptor in the venoconstriction induced by angiotensin II in both the inferior vena cava and femoral vein
Although angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction has been demonstrated in the rat vena cava and femoral vein, the angiotensin II receptor subtypes (AT₁ or AT₂) that mediate this phenomenon have not been precisely characterized. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize the pharmacological r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Peptides (New York, N.Y. : 1980) N.Y. : 1980), 2011, Vol.32 (1), p.112-117 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Although angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction has been demonstrated in the rat vena cava and femoral vein, the angiotensin II receptor subtypes (AT₁ or AT₂) that mediate this phenomenon have not been precisely characterized. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterize the pharmacological receptors involved in the angiotensin II-induced constriction of rat venae cavae and femoral veins, as well as the opposing effects exerted by locally produced prostanoids and NO upon induction of these vasomotor responses. The obtained results suggest that both AT₁ and AT₂ angiotensin II receptors are expressed in both veins. Angiotensin II concentration–response curves were shifted toward the right by losartan but not by PD 123319 in both the vena cava and femoral vein. Moreover, it was observed that both 10⁻⁵M indomethacin and 10⁻⁴M L-NAME improve the angiotensin II responses in the vena cava and femoral vein. In conclusion, in the rat vena cava and femoral vein, angiotensin II stimulates AT₁ but not AT₂ to induce venoconstriction, which is blunted by vasodilator prostanoids and NO. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-9781 1873-5169 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.10.010 |