Loading…
The Bentall procedure: Is it the gold standard? A series of 597 consecutive cases
Objectives We compared aortic root reconstructions using conduits with biological valves and mechanical valves. Methods Of 597 patients (1995–2008), 307 (mean age 71 years [23–89 years]) had biological valves and 290 (mean age 51 years [21–82 years]) had mechanical valves. The subgroup of 242 patien...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (Print) 2010-12, Vol.140 (6), p.S64-S70 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objectives We compared aortic root reconstructions using conduits with biological valves and mechanical valves. Methods Of 597 patients (1995–2008), 307 (mean age 71 years [23–89 years]) had biological valves and 290 (mean age 51 years [21–82 years]) had mechanical valves. The subgroup of 242 patients aged 50 to 70 years included 133 with biological and 109 with mechanical valves. Results Overall hospital mortality was 3.9% with biological valves (n = 15; elective: 3.7% [n = 10]) versus 2.8% with mechanical valves (n = 8; elective: 1.4% [n = 3]). In patients 50 to 70 years, age greater than 65 years (relative risk: 3.3 [ P = .0001]), clot (relative risk: 2.5 [ P = .05]), coronary artery disease (relative risk:3.5 [ P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5223 1097-685X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.07.033 |