Body composition by hydrostatic weighing at total lung capacity and residual volume

Body density and percent fat were determined by hydro-static weighing (HW) at residual volume (RV), total lung capacity measured on land (TLCL), and total lung capacity measured in water (TLCW) in 50 male and 50 female subjects. Residual volume was measured on land by using the helium dilution metho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine and science in sports and exercise 1984-08, Vol.16 (4), p.411-414
Main Authors: Timson, B F, Coffman, J L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Body Composition
Body Weight
Female
Humans
Male
Methods
Residual Volume
Space life sciences
Total Lung Capacity
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Body density and percent fat were determined by hydro-static weighing (HW) at residual volume (RV), total lung capacity measured on land (TLCL), and total lung capacity measured in water (TLCW) in 50 male and 50 female subjects. Residual volume was measured on land by using the helium dilution method. Vital capacity was measured both on land and with the subject submerged to the neck in water. Total lung capacity was reduced during water submersion by 6.7 and 5.1% in males and females, respectively. Body density was 1.0588 +/- 0.0215, 1.0581 +/- 0.0207, and 1.0634 +/- 0.0214 for males, and 1.0246 +/- 0.0219, 1.0242 +/- 0.0233, and 1.0276 +/- 0.0238 for females at RV, TLCW, and TLCL, respectively. Percent fat was 17.7 +/- 9.7, 18.0 +/- 9.3, and 15.7 +/- 9.5 for males, and 33.4 +/- 10.3, 33.5 +/- 10.8, and 32.0 +/- 11.0 for females at RV, TLCW, and TLCL, respectively. Body density and percent fat were similar when measured by HW at RV and by HW at TLCW. Body density and percent fat measured by HW at TLCL were different than when measured by HW at RV (P less than 0.001). The subjects, using a modified 10-point Borg Scale, rated the HW procedure easier to perform at TLC than at RV (P less than 0.001). The results of this study indicate that measurement of body density and percent fat by HW at TLCW and HW at RV are similar, but if measured by HW at TLCL, body density is overestimated and percent fat is underestimated.
ISSN:0195-9131
1530-0315
DOI:10.1249/00005768-198408000-00015