Loading…
Comparison of different keratometers with the EyeSys videokeratoscope
We compared the accuracy and the reproducibility of the measurements using a Haag-Streit, a Shin-Nippon, and a Carl Zeiss keratometer and an EyeSys videokeratoscope. Two investigators performed 20 measurements on 3 calibrated steel balls and 5 measurements on 22 normal corneas with all instruments....
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica 1998-04, Vol.76 (2), p.158-164 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We compared the accuracy and the reproducibility of the measurements using a Haag-Streit, a Shin-Nippon, and a Carl Zeiss keratometer and an EyeSys videokeratoscope. Two investigators performed 20 measurements on 3 calibrated steel balls and 5 measurements on 22 normal corneas with all instruments. Calculating the accuracy of the measurements the limits of the 95% confidence intervals of the bias were determined. The accuracy was better than +/-0.1D for the keratometers, whereas it was better than +/-0.25D for the EyeSys videokeratoscope. The coefficient of reproducibility (1.96 x standard deviation) on test balls and corneas was smaller than 0.25D in the case of the Shin-Nippon and Carl Zeiss keratometers and the EyeSys videokeratoscope whereas it was between 0.25-0.5D in the case of the Haag-Streit keratometer. The Carl Zeiss keratometer was the best with respect to the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements. Paired t-test was used to find possible significant differences between the results of the two investigators, but only clinically insignificant differences were found. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1395-3907 1600-0420 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760207.x |