Loading…

Does Lipoprotein(a) Impair Endothelial Function?

Objectives. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] impairs endothelial function. Background. Elevated Lp(a) plasma levels have been demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. In atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction is kno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1998-02, Vol.31 (2), p.359-365
Main Authors: Schlaich, Markus P, John, Stefan, Langenfeld, Matthias R.W, Lackner, Karl J, Schmitz, Gerd, Schmieder, Roland E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives. This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] impairs endothelial function. Background. Elevated Lp(a) plasma levels have been demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. In atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction is known to be an early indicator of vascular changes. However, the effect of Lp(a) on nitric oxide (NO)-dependent vasodilator response has not yet been determined. We therefore examined the influence of Lp(a) on basal and stimulated NO-mediated vasodilator response in the forearm vascular bed. Methods. Strain gauge plethysmography was used to measure changes in forearm blood flow produced by intraarterial infusion of increasing doses of acetylcholine (3, 12, 24 and 48 μg/min), sodium nitroprusside (200, 800 and 3,200 ng/min) and N-monomethyl l-arginine (l-NMMA) (1, 2 and 4 μmol/min) in 57 white subjects (mean age ± SD 37 ± 14 years). Lp(a) plasma concentrations were determined by rocket immunoelectrophoresis. Results. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation tested by intraarterial acetylcholine and endothelium-independent vascular relaxation tested by intraarterial sodium nitroprusside were not correlated with Lp(a). Similarly, no significant differences in forearm blood flow changes were observed when patients were classified into tertiles according to their individual Lp(a) concentration. In contrast, changes in forearm blood flow after intraarterial l-NMMA indicating basal production and release of NO differed significantly among tertiles. Patients in the highest Lp(a) tertile (49.2 ± 20.3 mg/dl) had a much greater vasoconstrictive response to l-NMMA than patients in the lowest Lp(a) tertile (4.8 ± 2.5 mg/dl): 2 μmol/min of l-NMMA, −23.6 ± 22.5% vs. −10.4 ± 9.1% (p < 0.02); 4 μmol/min of l-NMMA, −27.8 ± 10.3% vs. −17.6 ± 9.9% (p < 0.03). Lp(a) plasma level consistently correlated negatively with the forearm blood flow responses to 4 μmol/min of intraarterial l-NMMA (r = −0.38, p < 0.01). Multiple stepwise regression analysis of variables, including total and high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, further confirmed that plasma Lp(a) remained a significant independent determinant of forearm blood flow changes in response to l-NMMA (p < 0.02). Conclusions. The endothelium-dependent vasoconstrictive response to l-NMMA was enhanced in subjects with relatively high Lp(a) plasma levels, suggesting an increased basal production and release of NO. This response seemed to
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00497-X