Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of different methods of carrying book bags on static posture and gait kinematics of youths aged 11-13 years. Surveys identified group descriptive characteristics of subjects and book bags. Ten subjects representing the best composite of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ergonomics 1997-06, Vol.40 (6), p.631-640
Main Authors: PASCOE, DAVID D., PASCOE, DONNA E., WANG, YONG TAI, SHIM, DONG-MING, KIM, CHANG K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescence
Adolescent
Analysis of Variance
Applied physiology
Backpacks
Biological and medical sciences
Book Bag
Child
Children & youth
Equipment and Supplies - adverse effects
Ergonomics
Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology
Gait
Gait - physiology
Health Surveys
Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology
Humans
Keywords: Backpack
Medical sciences
Posture
Posture - physiology
Rucksack
Shoulder - physiopathology
Space life sciences
Spine - physiopathology
Students - statistics & numerical data
Time and Motion Studies
Walking
Weight-Bearing - physiology
Youth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this investigation was to determine the impact of different methods of carrying book bags on static posture and gait kinematics of youths aged 11-13 years. Surveys identified group descriptive characteristics of subjects and book bags. Ten subjects representing the best composite of the mean characteristics of this population were filmed for both static posture and dynamic conditions of one stride length. Subjects participated in four conditions: without bag (WO), one-strap backpack (1BP), two-strap backpack (2BP), and one-strap athletic bag (ATH). Lateral spinal deviation was not significantly different between 2BP and WO. However, differences (±SE) were observed between 1BP (8.5±0·7°) and ATH (8·3±2·4°) as compared with WO (1·9±0·5°). Shoulder elevation from a horizontal position showed no difference between WO and 2BP. Without bag (2·0±0·9°) was different from 1BP 17·6±1·8°) and ATH (15·6±2·1°). 1BP was also different from 2BP (3·4 ±1·1°). Bag carrying significantly decreased stride length (1·597plusmn;0·04 m) and increased stride frequency (57·36±1·6 cycles/min) compared to WO (1·72±0·06 m; 54·64±1·2 cycles/min, respectively), thereby reducing the support phase of the gait. One-strap bags (1BP, ATH) promoted lateral spinal bending and shoulder elevation, while the two-strap backpack significantly reduced these book bag carrying stresses. ATH promoted greater angular motion of the head and trunk as compared to backpack book bags. Carrying a backpack (1BP, 2BP) promoted significant forward lean of head and trunk compared to ATH or WO. In conclusion, the daily physical stresses associated with carrying book bags on one shoulder (1BP, ATH) significantly alters the posture and gait of youth.
ISSN:0014-0139
1366-5847
DOI:10.1080/001401397187928