An evaluation of the Copper-T 380A IUD's safety and efficacy at three African centers

The use of intrauterine devices in Africa is low compared with other contraceptive methods such as oral contraceptives. This study, coordinated by Family Health International, evaluated the clinical performance (safety and efficacy) of the TCu 380A IUD in three African centers, respectively, in Came...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contraception (Stoneham) 1996-05, Vol.53 (5), p.293-298
Main Authors: Farr, Gaston, Amatya, Ramesh, Doh, Anderson, Ekwempu, C.C., Toppozada, Mokhtar, Ruminjo, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Africa
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Cameroon
contraceptive efficacy
Copper T 380A
Egypt
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
intrauterine devices
Intrauterine Devices, Copper - adverse effects
Medical sciences
Menstruation Disturbances - etiology
Nigeria
Other methods of contraception. Sterilization
Population
Pregnancy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The use of intrauterine devices in Africa is low compared with other contraceptive methods such as oral contraceptives. This study, coordinated by Family Health International, evaluated the clinical performance (safety and efficacy) of the TCu 380A IUD in three African centers, respectively, in Cameroon, Egypt, and Nigeria from 1986–1989. The 12-month unintended pregnancy rates were low for all three centers, ranging from none to 1.6 per 100 women. The 12-month discontinuation rates for all reasons ranged from 8.8 to 26.9 per 100 women. Statistically significant differences were observed among clinics for discontinuation rates for bleeding and/or pain and for planned pregnancy. The overall performance of the TCu 380A IUDs was considered satisfactory. Thus, the limited use of IUD in Africa could be due to the lack of accessibility, lack of information about, and confidence in the method rather than to documented clinical performance.
ISSN:0010-7824
1879-0518
DOI:10.1016/S0010-7824(96)00063-7