Normal diameter of the thoracic aorta in adults: a magnetic resonance imaging study

To determine the evolution of the diameter of the thoracic aorta with age in order to detect dilatation more reliably by imaging, we performed a retrospective analysis of the MRI examinations of the normal thoracic aorta of 66 subjects aged 44.1+/-19.1 years (range 19.1-82.4 years) obtained between...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) 2003-08, Vol.25 (3-4), p.322-329
Main Authors: GARCIER, J.-M, PETITCOLIN, V, FILAIRE, M, MOFID, R, AZARNOUCH, K, RAVEL, A, VANNEUVILLE, G, BOYER, L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - physiology
Anatomy & physiology
Aorta, Thoracic - anatomy & histology
Aorta, Thoracic - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Coronary vessels
Female
Heart
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Reference Values
Retrospective Studies
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To determine the evolution of the diameter of the thoracic aorta with age in order to detect dilatation more reliably by imaging, we performed a retrospective analysis of the MRI examinations of the normal thoracic aorta of 66 subjects aged 44.1+/-19.1 years (range 19.1-82.4 years) obtained between 1991 and 2000 on a Magnetom SP 42 1T apparatus (Siemens) using T1-weighted spin echo sequences with electrocardiographic synchronization. Sixteen measurements were made in the axial plane, the oblique sagittal plane in the axis of the aortic arch, and the oblique frontal plane perpendicular to the latter at the level of the ascending aorta, the arch and the descending thoracic aorta. We found an increase in the thoracic aorta diameter and a significant relationship between this diameter and the age of our subjects, wherever the measure was performed. However, there was no systematic correlation between aortic diameter and age. The aortic diameter evolved with age and a marked difference seemed to exist in measurements made in groups younger and older than 40 years. This study, conducted on a small population of 66 patients, thus helps to define a normal aortic diameter, thereby making the diagnosis of pathological dilatation of the aorta more reliable.
ISSN:0930-1038
1279-8517
DOI:10.1007/s00276-003-0140-z