Loading…

A Longitudinal Analysis of Total 3-Year Healthcare Costs for Older Adults Who Experience a Fall Requiring Medical Care

OBJECTIVES: To compare longitudinal changes in healthcare costs between fallers admitted to the hospital at the time of the fall (admitted), those not admitted to the hospital (nonadmitted), and nonfaller controls; test hypotheses related to differences in mean costs between and within these groups...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2010-05, Vol.58 (5), p.853-860
Main Authors: Bohl, Alex A., Fishman, Paul A., Ciol, Marcia A., Williams, Barbara, LoGerfo, James, Phelan, Elizabeth A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVES: To compare longitudinal changes in healthcare costs between fallers admitted to the hospital at the time of the fall (admitted), those not admitted to the hospital (nonadmitted), and nonfaller controls; test hypotheses related to differences in mean costs between and within these groups over time; and estimate the costs attributable to falling. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort. SETTING: Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound. PARTICIPANTS: Seven thousand nine hundred ninety‐three nonadmitted fallers, 976 admitted fallers, and 8,956 nonfallers aged 67 and older enrolled in an integrated healthcare delivery system. Fallers were identified according to fall‐related E‐Codes and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes recorded between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2006. Nonfallers were frequency matched on age group and sex. MEASUREMENTS: Quarterly costs during a 3‐year period were modeled using generalized estimating equations. Covariates included index age, sex, RxRisk (a comorbidity adjuster), fall status, time, and interactions between fall status and time. RESULTS: Cost differences between the faller cohorts and nonfallers were greatest in quarters closest to the fall (all P
ISSN:0002-8614
1532-5415
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02816.x