Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models

Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a univer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American psychologist 1979-07, Vol.34 (7), p.603-611
Main Author: Perry, Nathan W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Methods Training
Graduate Psychology Education
Human
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Psychology, Clinical - education
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-55a80c147dee12d396d7248b95afd1afd2585bc3772c8570360cac869c1bd8ca3
cites
container_end_page 611
container_issue 7
container_start_page 603
container_title The American psychologist
container_volume 34
creator Perry, Nathan W
description Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a university are unnecessary and undesirable, and (b) regardless of the type of model used, the highest level of quality is essential for the profession and the discipline of psychology. It is contended that ultimate control of the quality of education and training rests with psychology. (31 ref)
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.603
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74743341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1289801907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-55a80c147dee12d396d7248b95afd1afd2585bc3772c8570360cac869c1bd8ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kVtLAzEQhYN4q9U_ID4sKr5tzXWTPJbiDQq-KPYtpEnabslu1s2u0H9vSqWC4MMwDOebw3AGgEsERwgSfg8hJDksitmI0BEfFZAcgAGShOVSwtkhGOyBU3AW4zqNTEh0Ao6poBLTARh_rDaZ8WVdGu2zJm7MKviw3GQ2uJjVoctq52ymfefaWnfll8u6Vie8XmZVsM7Hc3C00D66i58-BO-PD2-T53z6-vQyGU9zTQTqcsa0gAZRbp1D2BJZWI6pmEumFxalwkywuSGcYyMYh6SARhtRSIPmVhhNhuBu59u04bN3sVNVGY3zXtcu9FFxyikhFCXw-g-4Dn063kdVIIoFppQl6OY_CGEhBUQS8kThHWXaEGPrFqppy0q3G4Wg2n5AbQNW24AVoYqr9IG0dPVj3c8rZ_cru8iTfLuTdaPVNnDddqXxLipdNb8u38qzjGE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614282445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Perry, Nathan W</creator><creatorcontrib>Perry, Nathan W</creatorcontrib><description>Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a university are unnecessary and undesirable, and (b) regardless of the type of model used, the highest level of quality is essential for the profession and the discipline of psychology. It is contended that ultimate control of the quality of education and training rests with psychology. (31 ref)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.603</identifier><identifier>PMID: 484924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Clinical Methods Training ; Graduate Psychology Education ; Human ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Psychology, Clinical - education ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 1979-07, Vol.34 (7), p.603-611</ispartof><rights>1979 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1979, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-55a80c147dee12d396d7248b95afd1afd2585bc3772c8570360cac869c1bd8ca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,786,790,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/484924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perry, Nathan W</creatorcontrib><title>Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a university are unnecessary and undesirable, and (b) regardless of the type of model used, the highest level of quality is essential for the profession and the discipline of psychology. It is contended that ultimate control of the quality of education and training rests with psychology. (31 ref)</description><subject>Clinical Methods Training</subject><subject>Graduate Psychology Education</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Psychology, Clinical - education</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kVtLAzEQhYN4q9U_ID4sKr5tzXWTPJbiDQq-KPYtpEnabslu1s2u0H9vSqWC4MMwDOebw3AGgEsERwgSfg8hJDksitmI0BEfFZAcgAGShOVSwtkhGOyBU3AW4zqNTEh0Ao6poBLTARh_rDaZ8WVdGu2zJm7MKviw3GQ2uJjVoctq52ymfefaWnfll8u6Vie8XmZVsM7Hc3C00D66i58-BO-PD2-T53z6-vQyGU9zTQTqcsa0gAZRbp1D2BJZWI6pmEumFxalwkywuSGcYyMYh6SARhtRSIPmVhhNhuBu59u04bN3sVNVGY3zXtcu9FFxyikhFCXw-g-4Dn063kdVIIoFppQl6OY_CGEhBUQS8kThHWXaEGPrFqppy0q3G4Wg2n5AbQNW24AVoYqr9IG0dPVj3c8rZ_cru8iTfLuTdaPVNnDddqXxLipdNb8u38qzjGE</recordid><startdate>197907</startdate><enddate>197907</enddate><creator>Perry, Nathan W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197907</creationdate><title>Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models</title><author>Perry, Nathan W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-55a80c147dee12d396d7248b95afd1afd2585bc3772c8570360cac869c1bd8ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Clinical Methods Training</topic><topic>Graduate Psychology Education</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Psychology, Clinical - education</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perry, Nathan W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perry, Nathan W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>1979-07</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>611</epage><pages>603-611</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><abstract>Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a university are unnecessary and undesirable, and (b) regardless of the type of model used, the highest level of quality is essential for the profession and the discipline of psychology. It is contended that ultimate control of the quality of education and training rests with psychology. (31 ref)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>484924</pmid><doi>10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.603</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof The American psychologist, 1979-07, Vol.34 (7), p.603-611
issn 0003-066X
1935-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_74743341
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Clinical Methods Training
Graduate Psychology Education
Human
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Psychology, Clinical - education
United States
title Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T17%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20clinical%20psychology%20does%20not%20need%20alternative%20training%20models&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Perry,%20Nathan%20W&rft.date=1979-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=611&rft.pages=603-611&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1289801907%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-55a80c147dee12d396d7248b95afd1afd2585bc3772c8570360cac869c1bd8ca3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614282445&rft_id=info:pmid/484924&rfr_iscdi=true