Why clinical psychology does not need alternative training models

Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a univer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American psychologist 1979-07, Vol.34 (7), p.603-611
Main Author: Perry, Nathan W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Methods Training
Graduate Psychology Education
Human
Humans
Models, Theoretical
Psychology, Clinical - education
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Current evidence suggests that the Boulder (scientist-professional) model of training in clinical psychology is eminently successful and widely accepted. The author argues that (a) alternative models of training that deemphasize research or general psychology and those programs not based in a university are unnecessary and undesirable, and (b) regardless of the type of model used, the highest level of quality is essential for the profession and the discipline of psychology. It is contended that ultimate control of the quality of education and training rests with psychology. (31 ref)
ISSN:0003-066X
1935-990X
DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.603