Timing of anticipatory muscle tensing control: responses before and after expected impact

It is widely accepted that human motor control is anticipatory in nature. Previous studies have used electromyography (EMG) to examine muscle responses to falling objects and identified anticipatory muscle tensing (AMT) as a spike in activation that occurs prior to object impact. Some studies have s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Experimental brain research 2010-05, Vol.202 (3), p.661-667
Main Authors: Vishton, Peter M, Reardon, Kristin M, Stevens, Jennifer A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cognition - physiology
Electromyography
Experiments
Female
Gravity
Humans
Judgment - physiology
Male
Muscle contraction
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests
Neurosciences
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Research Article
Time Perception - physiology
Velocity
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is widely accepted that human motor control is anticipatory in nature. Previous studies have used electromyography (EMG) to examine muscle responses to falling objects and identified anticipatory muscle tensing (AMT) as a spike in activation that occurs prior to object impact. Some studies have suggested that humans use an internal model of gravity to mediate precisely timed AMT responses. The present study further examines predictive motor control through the analysis of AMT during an object catching task. For some trials, participants watched an object falling toward the hand; for other trials, their eyes were closed. For some trials, the object fell downward and impacted the hand; for other randomly selected trials, the object abruptly stopped 12 cm above the hand, enabling an assessment of the effect of impact anticipation independent of the reflexive tactile response associated with an actual impact. In Experiment 1, AMT did not shift for approximately 113 ms after the abrupt stop of the ball. In Experiment 2, we randomly varied the start height of the object and found well-timed AMT with a 129-ms lag time. A control system based on simple memory for fall time duration cannot explain these findings. We argue that an AMT control system with a lag time of approximately 121 ms could not perform with human levels of accuracy without accounting for the acceleration of downward moving objects.
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-010-2172-z