Are humans cooperative breeders?: Most studies of natural fertility populations do not support the grandmother hypothesis

In discussing the effects of grandparents on child survival in natural fertility populations, Coall & Hertwig (C&H) rely extensively on the review by Sear and Mace (2008). We conducted a more detailed summary of the same literature and found that the evidence in favor of beneficial associati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Behavioral and brain sciences 2010-02, Vol.33 (1), p.35-39
Main Authors: Strassmann, Beverly I., Kurapati, Nikhil T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Birds
Children
Communal breeding
Family Relations
Fertility
Hypotheses
Nepotism
Nuclear family
Population studies
Siblings
Stem Family
Survival
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In discussing the effects of grandparents on child survival in natural fertility populations, Coall & Hertwig (C&H) rely extensively on the review by Sear and Mace (2008). We conducted a more detailed summary of the same literature and found that the evidence in favor of beneficial associations between grandparenting and child survival is generally weak or absent. The present state of the data on human alloparenting supports a more restricted use of the term “cooperative breeding.” Human stem family situations with celibate helpers-at-the-nest can be described as cooperatively breeding, but the term is a poor fit to many human family systems.
ISSN:0140-525X
1469-1825
DOI:10.1017/S0140525X09991749