Loading…

Evaluation of least-squares phase-diversity technique for space telescope wave-front sensing

Because of mechanical aspects of fabrication, launch, and operational environment, space telescope optics can suffer from unforeseen aberrations, detracting from their intended diffraction-limited performance goals. We give the results of simulation studies designed to explore how wave-front aberrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied optics (2004) 1997-12, Vol.36 (35), p.9186-9197
Main Authors: Lee, D J, Roggemann, M C, Welsh, B M, Crosby, E R
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Because of mechanical aspects of fabrication, launch, and operational environment, space telescope optics can suffer from unforeseen aberrations, detracting from their intended diffraction-limited performance goals. We give the results of simulation studies designed to explore how wave-front aberration information for such near-diffraction-limited telescopes can be estimated through a regularized, low-pass filtered version of the Gonsalves (least-squares) phase-diversity technique. We numerically simulate models of both monolithic and segmented space telescope mirrors; the segmented case is a simplified model of the proposed next generation space telescope. The simulation results quantify the accuracy of phase diversity as a wave-front sensing (WFS) technique in estimating the pupil phase map. The pupil phase is estimated from pairs of conventional and out-of-focus photon-limited point-source images. Image photon statistics are simulated for three different average light levels. Simulation results give an indication of the minimum light level required for reliable estimation of a large number of aberration parameters under the least-squares paradigm. For weak aberrations that average a 0.10lambda pupil rms, the average WFS estimation errors obtained here range from a worst case of 0.057lambda pupil rms to a best case of only 0.002lambda pupil rms, depending on the light level as well as on the types and degrees of freedom of the aberrations present.
ISSN:1559-128X
2155-3165
DOI:10.1364/AO.36.009186