The mouth-to-bag resuscitator during standard anaesthesia induction in apnoeic patients

Abstract Aim Ventilation of a non-intubated emergency patient by inexperienced rescuers with a standard bag-valve device may result in high inspiratory flow rates and subsequently high airway pressures with stomach inflation. Therefore, a self-inflating bag has been developed that requires lay rescu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resuscitation 2009-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1142-1146
Main Authors: Herff, Holger, Paal, Peter, Mitterlechner, Thomas, von Goedecke, Achim, Stadlbauer, Karl H, Voelckel, Wolfgang G, Zecha-Stallinger, Angelika, Wenzel, Volker
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Apnea - physiopathology
Apnea - therapy
Aspiration
Bag-valve device
Biological and medical sciences
Computerized, statistical medical data processing and models in biomedicine
Emergency
Female
Humans
Inhalation
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical computing and teaching
Medical sciences
Mouth-to-bag resuscitator
Pulmonary Ventilation
Respiration, Artificial - instrumentation
Resuscitation - instrumentation
Stomach inflation
Tidal Volume
Unprotected airway
Ventilation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aim Ventilation of a non-intubated emergency patient by inexperienced rescuers with a standard bag-valve device may result in high inspiratory flow rates and subsequently high airway pressures with stomach inflation. Therefore, a self-inflating bag has been developed that requires lay rescuers to blow up a single-use balloon inside an adult bag-valve device, which, in turn, displaces air within the bag towards the patient. This concept has been compared to standard adult bag-valve devices earlier in bench models but not in patients. Methods An anaesthetist who was blinded to all monitor tracings ventilated the lungs of 40 apnoeic patients during routine anaesthesia induction either with a standard bag-valve device or with the mouth-to-bag resuscitator in a random order. Study endpoints were peak inspiratory flow rates, peak airway pressure, tidal volumes and inspiratory time. Results Peak inspiratory flow was 40 ± 10 l min−1 for the standard bag-valve device versus 33 ± 13 l min−1 for the mouth-to-bag resuscitator ( P < 0.0001); peak airway pressure was 17 ± 5 cmH2 O versus 14 ± 5 cmH2 O ( P < 0.0001); inspiratory tidal volume was 477 ± 133 ml versus 644 ± 248 ml ( P < 0.001) and inspiratory time was 1.1 ± 0.3 s versus 1.9 ± 0.6 s ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion Employing the mouth-to-bag resuscitator during simulated ventilation of a non-intubated patient in respiratory arrest significantly decreased peak inspiratory flow and peak airway pressure and increased inspiratory tidal volume and inspiratory times compared to a standard bag-valve device.
ISSN:0300-9572
1873-1570
DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.026