Monitoring Sedation Status Over Time in ICU Patients: Reliability and Validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)

CONTEXT Goal-directed delivery of sedative and analgesic medications is recommended as standard care in intensive care units (ICUs) because of the impact these medications have on ventilator weaning and ICU length of stay, but few of the available sedation scales have been appropriately tested for r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2003-06, Vol.289 (22), p.2983-2991
Main Authors: Ely, E. Wesley, Truman, Brenda, Shintani, Ayumi, Thomason, Jason W. W, Wheeler, Arthur P, Gordon, Sharon, Francis, Joseph, Speroff, Theodore, Gautam, Shiva, Margolin, Richard, Sessler, Curtis N, Dittus, Robert S, Bernard, Gordon R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Analgesics - administration & dosage
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Conscious Sedation - standards
Conscious Sedation - statistics & numerical data
Consciousness
Critical Care - standards
Critical Care - statistics & numerical data
Electroencephalography
Female
Glasgow Coma Scale
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units - standards
Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Monitoring, Physiologic - standards
Monitoring, Physiologic - statistics & numerical data
Neuropsychological Tests
Patients
Reproducibility of Results
Respiration, Artificial
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:CONTEXT Goal-directed delivery of sedative and analgesic medications is recommended as standard care in intensive care units (ICUs) because of the impact these medications have on ventilator weaning and ICU length of stay, but few of the available sedation scales have been appropriately tested for reliability and validity. OBJECTIVE To test the reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Adult medical and coronary ICUs of a university-based medical center. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-eight medical ICU patients enrolled for reliability testing (46% receiving mechanical ventilation) from July 21, 1999, to September 7, 1999, and an independent cohort of 275 patients receiving mechanical ventilation were enrolled for validity testing from February 1, 2000, to May 3, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Interrater reliability of the RASS, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Ramsay Scale (RS); validity of the RASS correlated with reference standard ratings, assessments of content of consciousness, GCS scores, doses of sedatives and analgesics, and bispectral electroencephalography. RESULTS In 290-paired observations by nurses, results of both the RASS and RS demonstrated excellent interrater reliability (weighted κ, 0.91 and 0.94, respectively), which were both superior to the GCS (weighted κ, 0.64; P
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.289.22.2983