Loading…
Intravenous heparin did not prevent exacerbations of hereditary angioedema in a patient on maintenance hemodialysis
To the Editor In a recent article concerning the safety and efficacy of inhaled and subcutaneous heparin versus that of placebo in the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks (in the June 2002 issue of The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ), Weiler et al1 demonstrated that commer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2003-05, Vol.111 (5), p.1137-1137 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To the Editor In a recent article concerning the safety and efficacy of inhaled and subcutaneous heparin versus that of placebo in the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks (in the June 2002 issue of The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ), Weiler et al1 demonstrated that commercial heparin (either subcutaneously injected or inhaled) was ineffective in preventing exacerbations of HAE. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1067/mai.2003.1461 |