Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution

This study addresses some enduring issues of ontogenetic and evolutionary integration in the form of the hominid cranium. Our sample consists of 38 crania: 20 modern adult Homo sapiens, 14 subadult H. sapiens, and four archaic Homo. All specimens were CT-scanned except for two infant H. sapiens, who...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of human evolution 2003-02, Vol.44 (2), p.167-187
Main Authors:	Bookstein, Fred L, Gunz, Philipp, Mitterœcker, Philipp, Prossinger, Hermann, Schæfer, Katrin, Seidler, Horst
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Adult Animals Biological Evolution Cephalometry Cranial integration Female Fossils Geometric morphometrics Human ontogeny Human paleontology Human phylogeny Humans Infant Mankind origin and evolution Methodology and general studies Phylogeny Prehistory and protohistory Relative warps Singular warps Skull - anatomy & histology Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	This study addresses some enduring issues of ontogenetic and evolutionary integration in the form of the hominid cranium. Our sample consists of 38 crania: 20 modern adult Homo sapiens, 14 subadult H. sapiens, and four archaic Homo. All specimens were CT-scanned except for two infant H. sapiens, who were imaged by MR instead. For each specimen 84 landmarks and semilandmarks were located on the midsagittal plane and converted to Procrustes shape coordinates. Integration was quantified by the method of singular warps, a new geometric-statistical approach to visualizing correlations among regions. The two classic patterns of integration, evolutionary and ontogenetic, were jointly explored by comparing analyses of overlapping subsamples that span ranges of different hypothetical factors. Evolutionary integration is expressed in the subsample of 24 adult Homo, and ontogenetic integration in the subsample of 34 H. sapiens. In this data set, vault, cranial base, and face show striking and localized patterns of covariation over ontogeny, similar but not identical to the patterns seen over evolution. The principal differences between ontogeny and phylogeny pertain to the cranial base. There is also a component of cranial length to height ratio not reducible to either process. Our methodology allows a separation of these independent processes (and their impact on cranial shape) that conventional methods have not found.
ISSN:	0047-2484 1095-8606