Loading…

Brain dopamine is associated with eating behaviors in humans

Objective Eating behavior in humans is influenced by variables other than just hunger‐satiety including cognitive restraint, emotional distress, and sensitivity to food stimuli. We investigate the role of dopamine (DA), a neurotransmitter involved with food motivation, in these variables. Methods We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International journal of eating disorders 2003-03, Vol.33 (2), p.136-142
Main Authors: Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene-Jack, Maynard, Laurence, Jayne, Millard, Fowler, Joanna S., Zhu, Wei, Logan, Jean, Gatley, S. John, Ding, Yu-Shin, Wong, Christopher, Pappas, Naomi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Eating behavior in humans is influenced by variables other than just hunger‐satiety including cognitive restraint, emotional distress, and sensitivity to food stimuli. We investigate the role of dopamine (DA), a neurotransmitter involved with food motivation, in these variables. Methods We used the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) to measure Restraint, Emotionality, and Externality in 10 subjects. We correlated DEBQ scores with brain DA levels. Positron emission tomography and {11C}raclopride uptake were used to measure baseline D2 receptors (neutral stimulation) and to assess changes in extracellular DA to food stimulation (display of food). Results Restraint was correlated with DA changes with food stimulation (higher restraint, greater responsivity), emotionality was negatively correlated with baseline D2 receptors (higher emotionality, lower D2 receptors), whereas externality was not. These correlations were significant in the dorsal but not in the ventral striatum. Discussion These results provide evidence that DA in the dorsal striatum is involved with the restraint and emotionality components regulating eating behavior and that these two dimensions reflect different neurobiologic processes. © 2003 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Int J Eat Disord 33: 136–142, 2003.
ISSN:0276-3478
1098-108X
DOI:10.1002/eat.10118