Loading…

Angiographic results of "atypical" chest pain

Coronary angiography permits evaluation of coronary artery morphology and coronary pathology. It represents an accurate method of defining stenotic coronary lesions. Chest pain may be caused by coronary artery disease as well as by other cardiac and noncardiac disorders. However, sensitivity of clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Herz 2002-12, Vol.27 (8), p.772-779
Main Authors: Auer, Johann, Berent, Robert, Weber, Thomas, Maurer, Edwin, Punzengruber, Christian, Lassnig, Elisabeth, Mayr, Herbert, Eber, Bernd
Format: Article
Language:ger
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Coronary angiography permits evaluation of coronary artery morphology and coronary pathology. It represents an accurate method of defining stenotic coronary lesions. Chest pain may be caused by coronary artery disease as well as by other cardiac and noncardiac disorders. However, sensitivity of clinical evaluation and noninvasive diagnostic assessment in detection of coronary artery disease is limited. Noninvasive diagnostic strategies give inconsistent results in about 10-30%. Here coronary angiography is regarded as an accurate method for appropriate diagnosis. Ist sophisticated apparatus, cost, and invasiveness necessitate well-considered application of this procedure. Therefore, it appears important to analyze coronary angiograms in patients with the referral diagnosis of "atypical" chest pain with inconsistent noninvasive testing or impossibility to perform noninvasive assessment. We analyzed records of 1,000 consecutive patients (625 men, 375 women, mean age 63.1 years), who underwent coronary angiography at our institution from January 5, 1998 to May 5, 1998. 49 patients (17 women, 32 men; mean age 59 years) were referred due to "atypical" chest pain. 21 (42.9%, nine women, twelve men) of these 49 patients had normal coronary arteries at angiography. 21 (42.9%) patients showed coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50%. In seven (14.2%) patients, coronary sclerosis with a diameter stenosis < 50% could be observed. Only five (29.4%) of the 17 women but 16 of the 32 men (50%) had coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50% (p < 0.01). In unselected patients referred for coronary angiography due to "atypical" chest pain and inconsistent noninvasive testing or impossibility to perform noninvasive assessment. 42.9% had coronary artery disease with a diameter stenosis > 50%. Angiographic evaluation of symptomatic patients with "atypical" signs and symptoms and inconsistent noninvasive testing seems to be appropriate.
ISSN:0340-9937
1615-6692
DOI:10.1007/s00059-002-2311-9