Loading…
Induction of follicular wave emergence for estrus synchronization and artificial insemination in heifers
The objective was to synchronize follicular wave emergence among cattle for synchronization of estrus and ovulation, and to determine pregnancy rate after AI at observed estrus. At random stages of the estrous cycle, a controlled internal drug release device (CIDR-B) was inserted intravaginally (Day...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theriogenology 2000-09, Vol.54 (5), p.757-769 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The objective was to synchronize follicular wave emergence among cattle for synchronization of estrus and ovulation, and to determine pregnancy rate after AI at observed estrus. At random stages of the estrous cycle, a controlled internal drug release device (CIDR-B) was inserted intravaginally (Day 0) in 67 cross-bred beef heifers, and they were randomly allocated to receive either no further treatment (Control; n = 18); 5 mg of estradiol-17β and 100 mg of progesterone im (E/P; n = 16); 100 μg im of GnRH (GnRH; n = 16); or transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicular ablation of all follicles ≥5 mm (FA; n = 17). All heifers received a luteolytic dose of PGF (repeated 12 h later), and CIDR-B were removed on Days 9, 8, 6 or 5, in Control, E/P, GnRH or FA groups, respectively, so the dominant follicle of the induced wave was exposed to exogenous-progesterone for a similar period of time in each group. Mean (±SEM) intervals (and range, in days) from treatment to follicular wave emergence in these groups were 3.5 ±0.6 (−2 to 8), 3.4 ±0.1 (3 to 4), 1.5 ±0.3 (−1 to 4), and 1.0 ±0.1 (0 to 2), respectively. Although the interval was longest (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0093-691X 1879-3231 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00388-5 |