Patterns of DNA damage and photoinhibition in temperate South-Atlantic picophytoplankton exposed to solar ultraviolet radiation

Natural marine phytoplankton assemblages from Bahı́a Bustamante (Chubut, Argentina, 45°S, 66.5°W), mainly consisting of cells in the picoplankton size range (0.2–2 μm), were exposed to various UVBR (280–315 nm) and UVAR (315–400 nm) regimes in order to follow wavelength-dependent patterns...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology Biology, 2001-09, Vol.62 (1), p.9-18
Main Authors: Buma, Anita G.J., Walter Helbling, E., Karin de Boer, M., Villafañe, Virginia E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algae
Animals
Argentina
Atlantic Ocean
Climate
CPD
cyclobutane pyrmidine dimers
DNA
DNA Damage - radiation effects
Mid-Latitudes
Photosynthetic inhibition
Phytoplankton
Plankton - radiation effects
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Pyrimidine Dimers
Sunlight
Ultraviolet Rays
UVR
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Natural marine phytoplankton assemblages from Bahı́a Bustamante (Chubut, Argentina, 45°S, 66.5°W), mainly consisting of cells in the picoplankton size range (0.2–2 μm), were exposed to various UVBR (280–315 nm) and UVAR (315–400 nm) regimes in order to follow wavelength-dependent patterns of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) induction and repair. Simultaneously, UVR induced photosynthetic inhibition was studied in radiocarbon incorporation experiments. Biological weighting functions (BWFs) for photoinhibition and for CPD induction, the latter measured in bare calf thymus DNA, differed in the UVAR region: carbon incorporation was reduced markedly due to UVAR, whereas no measurable UVAR effect was found on CPD formation. In contrast, BWFs for inhibition of photosynthesis and CPD accumulation were fairly similar in the UVBR region, especially above 300 nm. Incubation of phytoplankton under full solar radiation caused rapid CPD accumulation over the day, giving maximum damage levels exceeding 500 CPD·MB −1 at the end of the afternoon. A clear daily pattern of CPD accumulation was found, in keeping with the DNA effective dose measured by a DNA dosimeter. In contrast, UVBR induced photosynthetic inhibition was not dose related and remained nearly constant during the day. Screening of UVBR or UVR did not cause significant CPD removal, indicating that photoreactivation either by PAR or UVAR was of minor importance in these organisms. High CPD levels were found in situ early in the morning, which remained unaffected notwithstanding treatments favoring photorepair. These results imply that a proportion of cells had been killed by UVBR exposure prior to the treatments. Our data suggest that the limited potential for photoreactivation in picophytoplankton assemblages from the southern Atlantic Ocean causes high CPD accumulation as a result of UVBR exposure.
ISSN:1011-1344
1873-2682
DOI:10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00156-7