Loading…

A systematic evaluation of bioelectrical impedance measurement after hemodialysis session

A systematic evaluation of bioelectrical impedance measurement after hemodialysis session. There is still no definitive indication about the ideal point of time to perform bioimpedance analysis (BIA) in hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, the interpretation of data in this regard is difficult becaus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Kidney international 2004-06, Vol.65 (6), p.2435-2440
Main Authors: Di Iorio, Biagio R., Scalfi, Luca, Terracciano, Vincenzo, Bellizzi, Vincenzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A systematic evaluation of bioelectrical impedance measurement after hemodialysis session. There is still no definitive indication about the ideal point of time to perform bioimpedance analysis (BIA) in hemodialysis patients. Furthermore, the interpretation of data in this regard is difficult because there is still no comprehensive information about the fluctuations in BIA variables occurring in these subjects. The aim of this study was to assess BIA changes occurring in hemodialysis and specifically in the dry-weight state. We studied 27 anuric patients (20 males and 7 females; age 56.1 ± 13.7years) on chronic hemodialysis. Single-frequency BIA (R, resistance; Xc, reactance; and PhA, phase angle) was performed (1) before and at the end of hemodialysis (dialysis period); (2) 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after hemodialysis (postdialysis period); and (3) 24, 48, and 68hours after hemodialysis (interdialysis period). Body weight decreased by 2.8 ± 0.8kg during hemodialysis, was unchanged during the postdialysis period, and progressively rose during the interdialysis period. At the same time, BIA variables significantly increased during hemodialysis (R, 453 ± 74 and 542 ± 98 ohm; Xc, 38 ± 10 and 53 ± 16 ohm; P < 0.05), remained stable over the 120-minute period after treatment (R, 538 ± 94, 539 ± 95, 538 ± 94, 541 ± 95, and 544 ± 95 ohm; and Xc, 53 ± 15, 53 ± 15, 51 ± 16, 52 ± 16, and 52 ± 16 ohm; NS), and subsequently declined [R, 471 ± 79 (P =
ISSN:0085-2538
1523-1755
DOI:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00660.x