Loading…

Predictive validity of the knee society index of severity: A prospective, multicenter cohort study

Compared with primary total knee arthroplasty, revision knee arthroplasties are more complex and account for greater expenditures of health care resources at all stages of the clinical process. The Knee Society Index of Severity (KSIS) was developed to stratify and quantify the severity of knee arth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2004-04, Vol.19 (3), p.322-328
Main Authors: The North American Knee Arthroplasty Revision (N.A.K.A.R.) Study Group, North American Knee Arthroplasty Revision (N.A.K.A.R.) Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Compared with primary total knee arthroplasty, revision knee arthroplasties are more complex and account for greater expenditures of health care resources at all stages of the clinical process. The Knee Society Index of Severity (KSIS) was developed to stratify and quantify the severity of knee arthroplasties, and it has proved to be a reliable and valid measure. This article evaluates the ability of the preoperative KSIS to predict intraoperative findings. Thirty-one surgeons from 13 institutions used the KSIS to classify preoperative clinical parameters and radiographs. Preoperatvie KSIS information was compared with intraoperative KSIS findings (reference standard). Unweighed kappa statistics were used to assess correlation. Sixty-three patients (65 cases) met inclusion criteria and were prospectively studied. All feasible comparisons between the preoperative and the intraoperative KSIS revealed statistically significant association, P
ISSN:0883-5403
1532-8406
DOI:10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00261-4