Loading…
The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube
The authors determined the influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures for the esophageal tracheal combitube. Twenty fresh cadavers were studied. Microchip sensors were attached to the anterior, lateral, and posterior surfaces of the dista...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 2002-05, Vol.96 (5), p.1074-1077 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The authors determined the influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures for the esophageal tracheal combitube.
Twenty fresh cadavers were studied. Microchip sensors were attached to the anterior, lateral, and posterior surfaces of the distal and proximal cuffs of the small adult esophageal tracheal combitube. Mucosal pressure for the proximal cuff in the pharynx was measured at 0- to 100-ml cuff volume in 10-ml increments, and for the distal cuff in the esophagus and trachea were measured at 0- to 20-ml cuff volume in 2-ml increments. The proximal cuff volume to form an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O was determined. In addition, mucosal pressures for the proximal cuff in the pharynx were measured in four awake volunteers with topical anesthesia.
There was an increase in mucosal pressure in the trachea, esophagus, and pharynx at all cuff locations with increasing volume (all: P < 0.001). Pharyngeal mucosal pressures were highest posteriorly (50-ml cuff volume: 99 +/- 62 cm H2O; 100-ml cuff volume: 255 +/- 161 cm H2O). Esophageal mucosal pressures were highest posteriorly (10-ml cuff volume: 108 +/- 55 cm H2O; 20-ml cuff volume: 269 +/- 133 cm H2O). Tracheal mucosal pressures were highest anteriorly (10-ml cuff volume: 98 +/- 53 cm H2O; 20-ml cuff volume: 236 +/- 139 cm H2O). The proximal cuff volume to obtain an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O was 47 +/- 12 ml. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures were similar for cadavers and awake volunteers.
We conclude that mucosal pressures for the esophageal tracheal combitube increase with cuff volume, are highest where the cuff is adjacent to rigid anatomic structures, and potentially exceed mucosal perfusion pressure even when cuff volumes are limited to achieving an oropharyngeal seal of 30 cm H2O. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-3022 1528-1175 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00008 |