Loading…
Radiotherapy for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial
PURPOSE: To report results of 18-month follow up of external beam radiation therapy with photons for subfoveal classic or occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 161 patients with subfoveal CNV in AR...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2002-04, Vol.133 (4), p.521-529 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | PURPOSE: To report results of 18-month follow up of external beam radiation therapy with photons for subfoveal classic or occult choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD).
DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: A total of 161 patients with subfoveal CNV in ARMD were recruited in a prospective double-masked study. The posterior pole of the afflicted eye was given 1 Gy (4 × 0.25 Gy) in the control group and 8 Gy (4 × 2 Gy) or 16 Gy (4 × 4 Gy) in the treatment groups. At the time of treatment, and 6, 12, and 18 months post treatment, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reading ability, and CNV size were measured.
RESULTS: At the completion of the study 150 (93.2%), 139 (86.3%), and 137 (85.1%) patients were followed for 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. The mean number of lines lost in the BCVA was −1.69, −2.2, and −3.23 in the 1 Gy group; −0.94, −1.25, and −1.73 in the 8 Gy group; −0.51, −0.67, and −1.93 in the 16 Gy group. The difference was significant after 12 months (
P = .016 for 8 Gy vs. 1 Gy;
P = .006 for 16 Gy vs. 1 Gy), and 18 months (
P = .011 for 8 Gy vs. 1 Gy;
P = .05 for 16 Gy vs. 1 Gy). The patients with classic CNV, or with an initial distance visual acuity ≥20/100, benefited more from treatment. A significant difference was not found between control group and treatment groups in the reading ability and in the CNV size. No radiation-associated side effects were reported thus far.
CONCLUSION: The number of lines lost in the BCVA was less in the 8 Gy and 16 Gy treatment groups than in the control group during the complete follow up examination. Radiation therapy with 8 Gy and 16 Gy, without showing any difference in efficacy, resulted in a near stabilization of the BCVA in patients with subfoveal classic or occult CNV in ARMD. Further studies are necessary to determine the significance of repeated radiotherapy series with a dose of 8 Gy to improve the effect on the CNV size and thereby to prolong stabilization of distance visual acuity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01336-3 |