Quantitative status of resources for radiation therapy in Asia and Pacific region

Purpose: Resources for radiation therapy in Asian and Pacific countries were analyzed to obtain a better understanding of the status of radiation oncological practice in the region. Methods and Materials: The data were obtained mainly through surveys on the availability of major equipment and person...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Radiotherapy and oncology 2001-07, Vol.60 (1), p.81-89
Main Authors:	Tatsuzaki, Hideo, Levin, Cecil Victor
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Asia Developing Countries Economics Equipment and supplies Financing, Government Health care facilities, manpower and services Humans Infant Infant Mortality International Agencies Pacific Islands Population Radiation Oncology - instrumentation Radiation Oncology - statistics & numerical data Radiation Oncology - trends Radiotherapy Radiotherapy - instrumentation Radiotherapy - statistics & numerical data Regional health planning Workforce
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Purpose: Resources for radiation therapy in Asian and Pacific countries were analyzed to obtain a better understanding of the status of radiation oncological practice in the region. Methods and Materials: The data were obtained mainly through surveys on the availability of major equipment and personnel which were conducted through an International Atomic Energy Agency regional project. The study included 17 countries in South Asia, South East Asia, East Asia and Australasia. Data were related to national populations and economic and a general health care indices. Results: Large differences in equipment and personnel among countries were demonstrated. The availability of both teletherapy and brachytherapy was related to the economic status of the countries. The shortage of teletherapy machines was evident in more countries than that of brachytherapy. Many departments were found to treat patients without simulators or treatment planning systems. The number of radiation oncologists standardized by cancer incidence of a country did not correlate well with economic status. Conclusions: There were significant deficiencies in the availability of all components of radiation therapy in the analyzed countries. The deficiencies were linked predominantly to the economic status of the country. Cognisance should be taken of the specific shortfalls in each country to ensure that expansion or any assistance offered appropriately match its needs and can be fully utilized. The information on the resources currently available for radiation oncological practice in the region presented in this paper provides a valuable basis for planning of development aid programs on radiation therapy.
ISSN:	0167-8140 1879-0887