Loading…

The prevalence of extracardiac findings by multidetector computed tomography before atrial fibrillation ablation

Background and Objectives The study was designed to determine the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered during multidetector computed tomography (CT) (MDCT) examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation. Multidetector CT has become a valuable tool in detailing left atrial anatomy before...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American heart journal 2008-02, Vol.155 (2), p.254-259
Main Authors: Schietinger, Brian J., MD, Bozlar, Ugur, MD, Hagspiel, Klaus D., MD, Norton, Patrick T., MD, Greenbaum, Heather R, Wang, Hongkun, PhD, Isbell, David C., MD, Patel, Rajan A.G., MD, Ferguson, John D., MD, Gay, Spencer B., MD, Kramer, Christopher M., MD, Mangrum, J. Michael, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Objectives The study was designed to determine the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered during multidetector computed tomography (CT) (MDCT) examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation. Multidetector CT has become a valuable tool in detailing left atrial anatomy before catheter ablation. The incidence of extracardiac findings has been reported for electron beam CT calcium scoring and coronary MDCT, but no data exist for the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered before atrial fibrillation ablation with MDCT. Methods and Results Clinical reports from MDCT examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation and interpretations by 2 radiologists blinded to the clinical reports were reviewed for significant additional extracardiac findings and recommendations for follow-up. In 149 patients who underwent MDCT, the mean age was 55.9 ± 11.0 years, 75% were men, and 47% had a history of smoking. Extracardiac findings were identified in 69% of patients with clinical, 90% of reader 1, and 97% of reader 2 interpretations (κ = 0.086). Follow-up was recommended in 30% of clinical, 50% of reader 1, and 38% of reader 2 interpretations (κ = 0.408). Pulmonary nodules were the most common additional finding and reason for suggested follow-up for all interpreters. Conclusions The prevalence of extracardiac abnormalities detected by MDCT is considerable. Significant variability in their identification exists between interpreters, but there is good agreement about the need for further follow-up. It is important that those who interpret these examinations are adequately trained in the identification and interpretation of both cardiac and extracardiac findings.
ISSN:0002-8703
1097-6744
DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.008