Where there's a will, is there a way?: Is New Zealand's publicly funded health sector able to steer towards population health?

Since 2000, the substantive focus of health policy in New Zealand has been closely aligned to the agendas of improving population health and reducing health inequalities. Health system restructuring, through the introduction of locally based and partially elected District Health Boards (DHBs), was t...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Social science & medicine (1982) 2008-10, Vol.67 (7), p.1143-1152
Main Authors:	Tenbensel, Tim, Cumming, Jacqueline, Ashton, Toni, Barnett, Pauline
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Biological and medical sciences Communities Community participation Data collection Decision making Health care policy Health Care Services Policy Health inequality Health Plan Implementation Health Policy Health Promotion - organization & administration Humans Medical sciences Miscellaneous New Zealand New Zealand Health policy Population health Strategic planning Priority-setting Community participation Participation Policy implementation Population health Priority-setting Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public Sector Regional Health Planning Strategic planning
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Since 2000, the substantive focus of health policy in New Zealand has been closely aligned to the agendas of improving population health and reducing health inequalities. Health system restructuring, through the introduction of locally based and partially elected District Health Boards (DHBs), was the structural mechanism chosen for reorienting the health sector towards population health. Strategic planning at the DHB level was the key mechanism by which central government population health objectives would be translated into local action. This analysis of the early years of elected DHBs (2001–2005) sets out to answer the following broad questions: (i) did strategic planning by District Health Boards reflect an orientation to population health?; (ii) to what extent was strategic planning towards population health shaped by community participation and input?; (iii) to what extent did strategic planning lead to a re-prioritisation of resources? These questions were explored as part of a larger research project investigating the introduction and implementation of the DHB system. Data were collected from over 350 interviews of local and national stakeholders, and two surveys of DHB Members between 2002 and 2004–2005. Overall, DHBs demonstrated the ‘will’ to engage in strategic decision-making processes to enhance population health but have difficulty in finding the ‘way’. The priorities and requirements of central government and the weight of institutional history were found to be the most influential factors on DHB decision-making and practice, with flexibility and innovation only exercised at the margins. This raises the key question of whether there is the governmental capacity at the local level to adequately address nationally determined population health policy priorities.
ISSN:	0277-9536 1873-5347