Loading…

Going Along Versus Going Alone: When Fundamental Motives Facilitate Strategic (Non)Conformity

Three experiments examined how 2 fundamental social motives-self-protection and mate attraction-influenced conformity. A self-protective goal increased conformity for both men and women. In contrast, the effects of a romantic goal depended on sex, causing women to conform more to others' prefer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2006-08, Vol.91 (2), p.281-294
Main Authors: Griskevicius, Vladas, Goldstein, Noah J, Mortensen, Chad R, Cialdini, Robert B, Kenrick, Douglas T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Three experiments examined how 2 fundamental social motives-self-protection and mate attraction-influenced conformity. A self-protective goal increased conformity for both men and women. In contrast, the effects of a romantic goal depended on sex, causing women to conform more to others' preferences while engendering nonconformity in men. Men motivated to attract a mate were particularly likely to nonconform when (a) nonconformity made them unique (but not merely a member of a small minority) and when (b) the topic was subjective versus objective, meaning that nonconformists could not be revealed to be incorrect. These findings fit with a functional evolutionary model of motivation and behavior, and they indicate that fundamental motives such as self-protection and mate attraction can stimulate specific forms of conformity or nonconformity for strategic self-presentation.
ISSN:0022-3514
1939-1315
DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281