Loading…
Going Along Versus Going Alone: When Fundamental Motives Facilitate Strategic (Non)Conformity
Three experiments examined how 2 fundamental social motives-self-protection and mate attraction-influenced conformity. A self-protective goal increased conformity for both men and women. In contrast, the effects of a romantic goal depended on sex, causing women to conform more to others' prefer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2006-08, Vol.91 (2), p.281-294 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Three experiments examined how 2 fundamental social motives-self-protection and mate attraction-influenced conformity. A self-protective goal increased conformity for both men and women. In contrast, the effects of a romantic goal depended on sex, causing women to conform more to others' preferences while engendering nonconformity in men. Men motivated to attract a mate were particularly likely to nonconform when (a) nonconformity made them unique (but not merely a member of a small minority) and when (b) the topic was subjective versus objective, meaning that nonconformists could not be revealed to be incorrect. These findings fit with a functional evolutionary model of motivation and behavior, and they indicate that fundamental motives such as self-protection and mate attraction can stimulate specific forms of conformity or nonconformity for strategic self-presentation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281 |