High-frequency percussive ventilation with systemic heparin improves short-term survival in a LD100 sheep model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

We undertook an assessment of high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) and systemic heparin on survival in our LD100 sheep model of smoke/burn-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This was a prospective controlled outcomes study in a large animal critical care laboratory. ARDS was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of burn care & research 2006-07, Vol.27 (4), p.463-471
Main Authors: DONGFANG WANG, ZWISCHENBERGER, Joseph B, SAVAGE, Clare, MILLER, Lucinda, DEYO, Donald J, ALPARD, Scott, CARDENAS, Victor J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animals
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Burns
Burns - complications
Combined Modality Therapy
Dermatology
Disease Models, Animal
Heparin - therapeutic use
High-Frequency Ventilation
Medical sciences
Pneumology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - etiology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy
Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases
Sheep
Smoke Inhalation Injury - complications
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We undertook an assessment of high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) and systemic heparin on survival in our LD100 sheep model of smoke/burn-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This was a prospective controlled outcomes study in a large animal critical care laboratory. ARDS was induced in 13 sheep by a combination of 48 cotton smoke breaths and 40% full-thickness cutaneous burn (LD100) followed by mechanical ventilation (15 ml/kg tidal volume). After meeting ARDS criteria (PaO2/FiO2 < 200), the sheep were divided into high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV; n = 7) or volume-controlled mechanical ventilation (VCMV; n = 6) groups. Both groups received systemic heparin to achieve an ACT 180-300 seconds. HFPV was managed with the Volumetric Diffusive Respiration Ventilator (Percussionaire Corp., Sandpoint, ID). The VCMV group was managed with up to 10 ml/kg tidal volume. Arterial blood gases and ventilator settings were monitored every 6 hours after onset of ARDS. HFPV did not affect sheep hemodynamics. Survival 84 hours after smoke and burn injury was significantly greater in the HFPV (7/7, 100%) compared with the VCMV group (3/6, 50%, P < .05). PaCO2 was significantly greater in VCMV group at 36, 48, and 72 hours after smoke and burn injury. PaO2/FiO2 after 36 hours of smoke and burn injury in the HFPV group was improved compared with the VCMV group, but no statistical difference was found. In the VCMV group, peak airway pressure was decreased to 19.7 +/- 2.2 cm H2O at 36 hours from 29 +/- 2.8 at 24 hours as the tidal volume changed from 15 ml/kg to 10 ml/kg and then gradually increased to 39 +/- 5.6 cm H2O at 72 hours. In the HFPV group, peak inspiratory pressure kept constant at a level of 30 cmH2O. In our smoke/burn-induced LD100 sheep model of ARDS, volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with systemic heparin achieved a 50% survival whereas HFPV with systemic heparin achieved 100% survival at 60 hours after the onset of ARDS.
ISSN:1559-047X
1559-0488
DOI:10.1097/01.BCR.0000226003.18885.E8