Interlaboratory Comparison of Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Measurements From 2 to 9 MHz

Objectives As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other tw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2005-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1235-1250
Main Authors: Wear, Keith A, Stiles, Timothy A, Frank, Gary R, Madsen, Ernest L, Cheng, Francis, Feleppa, Ernest J, Hall, Christopher S, Kim, Beom Soo, Lee, Paul, O'Brien, William D., Jr, Oelze, Michael L, Raju, Balasundar I, Shung, K. Kirk, Wilson, Thaddeus A, Yuan, Jian R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
1-Propanol
Acrylic Resins
Agar
backscatter
Equipment Design
Glass
Graphite
Humans
interlaboratory comparison
Laboratories
Phantoms, Imaging
Plastics
tissue characterization
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonography - standards
Water
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives As are the attenuation coefficient and sound speed, the backscatter coefficient is a fundamental ultrasonic property that has been used to characterize many tissues. Unfortunately, there is currently far less standardization for the ultrasonic backscatter measurement than for the other two, as evidenced by a previous American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM)–sponsored interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements (J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18:615–631). To explore reasons for these disparities, the AIUM Endowment for Education and Research recently supported this second interlaboratory comparison, which extends the upper limit of the frequency range from 7 to 9 MHz. Methods Eleven laboratories were provided with standard test objects designed and manufactured at the University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI). Each laboratory was asked to perform ultrasonic measurements of sound speed, attenuation coefficients, and backscatter coefficients. Each laboratory was blinded to the values of the ultrasonic properties of the test objects at the time the measurements were performed. Results Eight of the 11 laboratories submitted results. The range of variation of absolute magnitude of backscatter coefficient measurements was about 2 orders of magnitude. If the results of 1 outlier laboratory are excluded, then the range is reduced to about 1 order of magnitude. Agreement regarding frequency dependence of backscatter was better than reported in the previous interlaboratory comparison. For example, when scatterers were small compared with the ultrasonic wavelength, experimental frequency‐dependent backscatter coefficient data obtained by the participating laboratories were usually consistent with the expected Rayleigh scattering behavior (proportional to frequency to the fourth power). Conclusions Greater standardization of backscatter measurement methods is needed. Measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter are more consistent than measurements of absolute magnitude.
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1235