Identifying the performance criteria for appraisal of colposcopists: benchmarking Delphi

Background  Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2007-10, Vol.114 (10), p.1288-1291
Main Authors: Thangaratinam, S, Walker, P, Freeman‐Wang, T, Luesley, D, Cruickshank, M, Redman, CWE
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Appraisal
Benchmarking
Biological and medical sciences
Cervical cancer
Clinical Competence - standards
colposcopy
Colposcopy - standards
Delphi
Delphi Technique
Female
Gynecology
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical Audit
Medical diagnosis
Medical personnel
Medical sciences
Performance evaluation
Surveys and Questionnaires
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background  Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the time of appraisal. Objective  To identify the performance criteria essential for appraisal of colposcopists by two‐generational Delphi survey. Design  Delphi survey. Setting  Annual British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology conference (BSCCP 2005, Edinburgh, UK). Population  Four hundred and ninety‐nine delegates attending the above conference. Method  A two‐generational Delphi survey was undertaken to identify the criteria needed for appraisal. The participants were asked to rate the relevance of quality items that might be considered necessary for appraisal of performance of colposcopists. After the first round, the results were presented, and the respondents were given the chance to reflect on their response and change it if necessary. Main outcome measures  Criteria considered to be essential for appraisal of colposcopists in areas of training, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and communication. Results  In the first round, 306/499 (61%) participants returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty percent (187/306) of participants returned their questionnaire in the second round. In addition to BSCCP certification, four other criteria were identified, which were quality of recorded findings, biopsy rate when atypia noted, proportion of biopsies histologically adequate and proportion of normal initial posttreatment follow‐up smears. Conclusion  This Delphi survey has been the first to identify criteria to be used in the annual appraisal of professionals. It has resulted in a number of criteria that could be considered for the appraisal and possible revalidation of colposcopists practising in UK.
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01442.x