Clinically Relevant Issues Related to Preheating Composites

ABSTRACT Statement of the Problem:  Issues regarding the use of composite preheating need to be investigated so that the clinician will better understand the variables associated with this method. Purpose:  To examine the multiple aspects of use of a commercial composite preheating device (Calset, A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2006-11, Vol.18 (6), p.340-350
Main Authors: Daronch, Márcia, Rueggeberg, Frederick A., Moss, Linda, De Goes, Mario Fernando
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acrylic Resins - chemistry
Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Materials - chemistry
Dentistry
Heating - instrumentation
Hot Temperature
Polyurethanes - chemistry
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Statement of the Problem:  Issues regarding the use of composite preheating need to be investigated so that the clinician will better understand the variables associated with this method. Purpose:  To examine the multiple aspects of use of a commercial composite preheating device (Calset, AdDent Inc., Danbury, CT, USA). Materials and Methods:  Temperature values of three heating units and composite compules were obtained using a K‐type thermocouple and were recorded digitally in real time. The following parameters were measured: maximum heater and composite temperature and its stability upon storage, composite temperature change when removed from the heater and injected, the effect of delivery system on ejected composite temperature, and the effect of repeated and extended preheating on composite monomer conversion (using infrared spectroscopy). Monomer conversion was measured after repeated composite cycling (from room temperature [RT] to 60°C, 10×) or extended preheating (24 hours at 60°C), and values were compared with composite maintained at RT (control group). Among test parameters, data (N=5 for each parameter) were analyzed using Student’s t‐test, analysis of variance, and the Tukey–Kramer post‐hoc test where appropriate (alpha=0.05). Results/Conclusions:  Two of the three tested units achieved the stated preset temperatures. Composite attained temperature values close to the heating unit. Composite temperature drop upon removal from the heater was dramatic: within 2 minutes a 50% temperature drop was noted. Heating the compule while preloaded in the syringe provided higher delivery temperatures than heating the compule separately (p < 0.00). Optimum results were achieved when preheated composite was dispensed and used as quickly as possible. Neither repeated nor extended preheating of composite significantly affected monomer conversion. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Preheating composite has potential benefits, but should be used with knowledge of its limitations. Reheating of unused composite does not affect its degree of conversion, thus decreasing material waste. Heating of the composite preloaded in the delivery syringe enhances the temperature of extruded composite.
ISSN:1496-4155
1708-8240
DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00046.x