Multimerization: closed or open association scenario?

We address the problem of classification of the type of association (multimerization) in solutions of identical unimers. Although the aggregation is still routinely characterized in terms of either "open association" or "closed association" models, neither of the two models can p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The European physical journal. E, Soft matter and biological physics Soft matter and biological physics, 2005-07, Vol.17 (3), p.327-337
Main Authors: Nyrkova, I A, Semenov, A N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Colloids - analysis
Colloids - chemistry
Computer Simulation
Crystallization - methods
Dimerization
Macromolecular Substances - analysis
Macromolecular Substances - chemistry
Models, Chemical
Models, Molecular
Molecular Conformation
Molecular Weight
Polymers - analysis
Polymers - chemistry
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We address the problem of classification of the type of association (multimerization) in solutions of identical unimers. Although the aggregation is still routinely characterized in terms of either "open association" or "closed association" models, neither of the two models can provide a fair description of many aggregation processes. We demonstrate that a realistic multimerization may show mixed basic features, i.e. simultaneously those typical of the classical open association and those typical of the classical closed association. In particular, we show that a living polymerization may seem to exhibit a critical micelle concentration (CMC), whereas the basic integral characteristics of a "closed" system with rather monodisperse micelles ((m(w)/m(n)(mic) = 1.02) may not imply a well-defined CMC. Therefore, a multimerization must be characterized by the detailed micelle size distribution that largely defines the equilibrium and dynamical properties of the system. To this end, we suggest a simple method of deriving the micelle size distribution c(m) (depending also on the total concentration of amphiphilic molecules) from the concentration dependence of just the mean aggregation number, m(w)(c). Our results thus invite a reconsideration of the basic methods used for interpretation of experimental data on micellization.
ISSN:1292-8941
1292-895X
DOI:10.1140/epje/i2004-10146-5